We the mainstream
Posted by Chris on October 6, 2006 at 10:58 am
I’m feeling like leaving the country more and more and its not just the weather. It’s the fault of that show everyone watches; the news. The writing’s not as good as X-Factor and there’s no Mariah Carey key changes when something important happens. I did, however, see for the first time last night reconstructions of events on the 10 o clock news. The event in question was an angry looking Pakistani man talking to two other men, the story was terrorist/islamic exteremist (we don’t call them fascists over here yet) recruiting in universities. This on the same day that one eyed jack (by which I mean he’s a prick) expressed a personal dislike for the veil. Now although Downing Street argues this is a personal view, it is concurrent with John Reid’s warning Muslim parents to be vigilent against signs of extremism which threaten to rise like acne in their children.
The lines of the ‘war on terror’ are being redrawn domestically in Britain along cultural lines in the wake of the uncontestable failure of the military virtual-media/physical-bombing dynamic. So half the time on the BBC’s flagship news programme is given over to positing British mainstream values through the simultaneous positing of non-mainsteam (i.e. extremist) bogeymen. Jack Straw calls for a debate but the only debate permitted is where the boundaries of otherness should lie (i.e. should we allow the veil), the existence, coherence and position of ‘we’ is of course taken for granted. This may well come as no suprise; national governments have always been concerned with nation-building – the fact that people continue to believe in the concept of a nation is where they draw their legitimacy from – but suprising or not it still upsets me. I don’t like to be told what I think, or what ‘we’ think, I also don’t like seeing the lazy news editors swallowing every cultural dynamic they are fed in a calucated series of speeches co-ordinated by government press offices who know exactly what they are doing. I also don’t like to see people eager to represent the ‘other’ which the government requires to argue its legitimacy leap thoughtlessly into the media spotlight (that’s the other side – and predictably also the focus of the John Reid story). This behaviour allows even lazier newspaper editors the perfect excuse to suffix every story they write with the word ‘row’ or indeed ‘race row’.
There has never been such a thing as Britishness or British values these things have only ever been a site of power (cheers Michel). The othering of muslims and the simultaneous olive branch they are offered to become ‘mainstream muslims’ is a cynical attempt by the government and the media (who I regard as lazy rather than politically engaged) to legitimate its foreign policy by drawing attention away from the fact that people want to bomb London primarily because of war crimes committed by British soldiers overseas.
Rant over, I’m done. A year from now I’ll be in Japan (where I can’t understand the news).

